By Kuo Yong Kooi
The opposition wows to continue with more Blackout 505 rallies that focuses on making three key demands.
They are; the top heads of the EC to resign from their posts; fresh elections to be conducted in 30 parliamentary seats; and to postpone any amendments to election laws and constituency re-delineation exercises.
Holding more rallies is a great way to empower the masses and encourage the growth of peoples’ movement in shaping a healthy democracy.
But as an overall strategy to win the hearts and minds of the other 48% who voted for the BN, it might not be a good idea.
The pro-Umno media have been creating the perception that the opposition under the leadership of Anwar Ibrahim are sore losers, crying over spilled milk and not willing to move on for the good of the nation.
The arguments they put forward are that the opposition accepted the results of the three states that they have won, but disputed the others that they have lost and the Blackout 505 rallies have to end soon for the nation to move on.
These are reasonable points of argument in the eyes of those who voted for BN.
Art Harun pointed out another valid argument that gerrymandering was never an issue at all and Pakatan never challenged the legality of the delineation prior to 2008 elections in his article ‘Is BN a validly elected government?’
Within the opposition ranks there are also dissenters for more rallies.
The salient point that the opposition must consider is that will this “more rallies strategy to highlight the fraudulent GE13 and adding the latest three point demands” able win the hearts and minds of the other 48% who voted for BN?
If it doesn’t it will only serve to divide our nation further and intensify the current stalemate. Bear in mind we might also lose more Pakatan supporters along the way as people might be “rally fatigued” and bored with the same points of argument in all the Blackout 505 rallies.
The reality is we can never replicate the initial Blackout 505 rally at Kelana Jaya Stadium on May 8.
Further rallies will only draw smaller crowds and dampen more spirits or hopes for change.
Hishamuddin Rais and Anyhing But Umno (ABU)’s head Harris Ibrahim have always pointed out that “Pilihan Jalan Raya” is the only way to change the government.
If we are prepared to take the path of more rallies, we might as well go all the way. Asking the EC to resign is not all the way. Asking the IGP, AG and MACC’s head to resign to me is a more “holistic” approach to this problem.
We are not asking the toppling of the current “so-called” legitimately elected government.
We are only asking for the installation of neutral/independent or non-partisan heads of these four crucial government departments so that they can facilitate and mitigate our current “stalemate” situation.
The point that can gain universal approval is that if the police are charging the opposition figures under the sedition act, they also need to charge the heads of Utusan, Ibrahim Ali, Zulkifli Nordin, Dr Mahathir Mohammad and others that have made seditious statements too, as what Haris Ibrahim said after he was released and charged.
If we are to hold more rallies and make great strife to cut one carrot (the EC’s resignation), we might as well cut the other three carrots along the way (which is the IGP, A-G and head of the MACC’s resignations).
Changing the EC head might give us hope of a free and fair election in five years’ time, but what about remedies for now till before GE14?
We were told that the courts might take up to six months to settle all the petitions that the opposition had filed on the 13th general election.
The second of the three points demand for fresh elections to be conducted in 30 parliamentary seats is a waste of “chi” as shouting slogans in a rally when the courts have not even started to look at the petitions filed.
We cannot file petitions and at the same time ask for fresh elections on the 30 parliamentary seats.
The settlement of the petition filed in court precedes the demand for a fresh election.
Let’s say hypothetically we managed to pressure the Najib administration to change the head of the EC through the rallies in the near future.
That do not weed out the same “shifty clown politicians” that have been running wild on the floors of our parliament for the last three or four decades.
On the other hand if we managed to push for an independent attorney general, inspector general of police and head of MACC after holding a series of rallies, we might have a totally new breed of politicians on the floors of our Parliament after GE14.
The “shifty” politicians who are corrupt would have either end up in jail or migrated overseas with our nation’s loot long before the next general election commences.
Cutting four carrots with one knife will most likely not dampen the spirits of the future rally goers. It might also attract more supporters from the other 48% who voted for BN.
More than 51% of the electorate believed that Pakatan can be a more accountable and transparent administration.
Over 48% believed otherwise. The majority would like a more transparent, accountable and independent government departments.
If the rally themes focus only on electioneering and post GE13 matters, the onus seemed to be on the Pakatan side to stop the rallies so that our country can move on.
Furthermore it looks like Pakatan is only concerned with winning elections.
However if the rallies focus on changing the heads of EC, IGP, MACC and AG, the onus is on the Umno side to change this so that our country can move on.
We must note that not all who voted against BN likes Pakatan. It is because they hated Umno for stifling our democracy through installing pro-Umno IGPs, AGs, ECs and heads of MACC that landed our nation in this current state.
Some voted for PSM, STAR and many other independent candidates because they were thumping their noses at the arrogance of the Pakatan leaders that had bypassed their years of hard and arduous grass-root work.
Further rallies that demand the new appointments of independent or non partisan “heads” of these crucial four government departments is a “unifying” theme. Don’t you agree?